Science And Civilisation In China, Vol. 2, Hist... -

The shadow hanging over the entire volume is the famous : If China was so far ahead of Europe in the Middle Ages, why did the Scientific Revolution happen in Europe and not China?

The core takeaway of Needham’s research is the concept of . He argues that while Western thought (influenced by the Greeks and later Newton) often viewed the universe as a giant machine governed by a "Lawgiver" God, Chinese thought viewed the world as a self-governing organism. Science and Civilisation in China, Vol. 2, Hist...

Volume 2 suggests the answer lies in the very philosophy that made China great. The organic view of the world was excellent for observation and systems thinking, but it didn't naturally lead to the "mathematization" of nature that defined the Western Scientific Revolution. Furthermore, the "Bureaucratic Feudalism" of the Chinese state, while stable, didn't provide the competitive mercantile environment that spurred European innovation. Why It Still Matters The shadow hanging over the entire volume is

Needham’s work was a massive "de-centering" of Western history. He proved that the "Dark Ages" weren't dark everywhere and that the foundations of modern technology—from the compass to gunpowder—were built on a bedrock of sophisticated Eastern philosophy. Volume 2 suggests the answer lies in the

²é¿´ÍêÕû°æ±¾: TW·±ówÖÐÎÄWin10x64 Æó˜I°æ 2016 LTSB éLÆÚ¾S×o°æ14393.187 ß@Á¿¾«égÃâJiHuo°æ