[s12e21] The Plagiarism Schism Direct

The integrity of the scientific community relies on the honesty of its members. While we opted for "the high road," the exposure of Dr. Pemberton's past misconduct serves as a reminder that academic fraud eventually undermines even the most public of successes.

Utilizing the evidence would effectively disqualify our competitors and secure our path to the Nobel Prize. [S12E21] The Plagiarism Schism

While competing for the Nobel Prize for our theory of Super-Asymmetry, we were approached by , who provided evidence that Dr. Pemberton’s doctoral thesis contained significant portions of uncredited material. The integrity of the scientific community relies on

Barry Kripke, via personal academic networks. 3. Ethical Deliberations Barry Kripke, via personal academic networks

This report details the discovery of evidence suggesting that Dr. Gregory Pemberton engaged in academic plagiarism during his tenure at the University of Chicago. This information was brought to our attention during the competitive process for Nobel Prize consideration in Physics.